From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conforto v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 20, 2012
2012-3119 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 20, 2012)

Opinion

2012-3119

06-20-2012

MARIE C. CONFORTO, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. SF0752120154-I-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of the Navy (Navy) moves to reform the caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. In this case, the Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion to reform the official caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

FOR THE COURT

______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
cc: Scott L. Zielinski, Esq.

Katy M. Bartelma, Esq

Katherine Smith, Esq.
s21


Summaries of

Conforto v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 20, 2012
2012-3119 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Conforto v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:MARIE C. CONFORTO, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 20, 2012

Citations

2012-3119 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 20, 2012)