From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Confidence Beauty Salon Corp. v. 299 Third SA, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 7, 2017
148 A.D.3d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-07-2017

CONFIDENCE BEAUTY SALON CORP., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 299 THIRD SA, LLC, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Goldberg, Scudieri & Lindenberg, P.C., New York (Michael Brian Cronk of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Fred L. Seeman, New York (Fred L. Seeman of counsel), for respondents.


Goldberg, Scudieri & Lindenberg, P.C., New York (Michael Brian Cronk of counsel), for appellant.

Law Offices of Fred L. Seeman, New York (Fred L. Seeman of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered on or about December 3, 2015, which denied plaintiff's application for a Yellowstone injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The denial of Yellowstone relief was a provident exercise of discretion because plaintiff failed to aver, let alone demonstrate, that it had the ability to cure its alleged defaults (see Artcorp Inc. v. Citirich Realty Corp., 124 A.D.3d 545, 2 N.Y.S.3d 109 [1st Dept.2015] ).

ACOSTA, J.P., RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, GISCHE, WEBBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Confidence Beauty Salon Corp. v. 299 Third SA, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 7, 2017
148 A.D.3d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Confidence Beauty Salon Corp. v. 299 Third SA, LLC

Case Details

Full title:CONFIDENCE BEAUTY SALON CORP., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 299 THIRD SA, LLC…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 7, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
47 N.Y.S.3d 905

Citing Cases

MGR Res. Mgmt., Inc. v. Barranca Family Tr.

Further, as the Tenant has demonstrated a willingness to cure the alleged breach, an injunction may be…