From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coney v. Lozo

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 19, 2023
2:23-cv-01645-CDS-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01645-CDS-EJY

10-19-2023

WILLIAM CONEY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MICHAEL LOZO, OFFICER A. MARISCAL, JOSEPH LOMBARDO; CLARK COUNTY COUNCIL, Defendants.


ORDER

ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is no longer at the address on file with the Court (see ECF No. 4) and has failed to file an updated address as required by U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada Local Rule IA 31.

LR IA 3-1 states a “pro se party must immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing address, email address, telephone number, or facsimile number. ... Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action, entry of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court.”

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than November 17, 2023 Plaintiff must file an updated address with the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Order may result in a recommendation to dismiss this case without prejudice.


Summaries of

Coney v. Lozo

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 19, 2023
2:23-cv-01645-CDS-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Coney v. Lozo

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM CONEY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MICHAEL LOZO, OFFICER A. MARISCAL…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 19, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01645-CDS-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2023)