Under the TGTLA, Tennessee courts recognize that the burden rests on the party moving for summary judgment. See Sides v. Cooper, No. W2011-00813-COA-R3-CV, 2011 WL 6712717, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2011) (stating that, in a claim under the TGTLA, "we must consider . . . the evidentiary materials in the light most favorable to the movant's opponent" (quotation omitted)); Condra v. Bradley County, No. E2007-01290-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 196020, at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 28, 2009) (stating that "the movant . . . did not meet its burden" to obtain summary judgment under the plaintiff's TGTLA claim). In addition, a defendant's request for statutory immunity under the TGTLA is an affirmative defense, Morgan v. Memphis Light Gas & Water Co., No. W2016-01249-COA-R3-CV, 2018 WL 733217, at *1 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 2018), for which the defendant bears the burden of proof at trial, Weaver v. Deverell, No. W2011-00563-COA-R3-CV, 2011 WL 5069418, at *7 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 26, 2011) ("An affirmative defense will shift the burden of proof to the defendant."