From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Concreform Company v. Van Dorn

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 9, 1968
214 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 37543.

October 9, 1968.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Rose Marlow, Miami, for petitioners.

Jules R. Israel, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 26, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly, the petition for certorari is denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C.J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Concreform Company v. Van Dorn

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 9, 1968
214 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Concreform Company v. Van Dorn

Case Details

Full title:CONCREFORM COMPANY, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. JOHN VAN DORN ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 9, 1968

Citations

214 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1968)