From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Concourse Rehab. Nsg. Ctr. v. Novello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 2003
309 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1813

October 9, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Paul Victor, J.), entered on or about June 12, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted the motion of defendant Antonia Novello, as Commissioner of the Department of Health (the State), to dismiss plaintiff's federal claims, and granted the motion of defendant Foundation for Quality Medical Care, Inc. (Foundation) to dismiss the complaint against it in its entirety, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Marvin Neiman, for plaintiffs-appellants.

James M. Hershler James F. O'Brien, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Sullivan, Ellerin, Friedman, JJ.


The claims against the Foundation were properly dismissed, since plaintiffs failed to allege with any specificity facts that would support a claim for conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1985(3) (see Zemsky v. City of New York, 821 F.2d 148, cert denied 484 U.S. 965). The circumstance that the Foundation was the State's agent, and in that capacity acted pursuant to lawful regulations promulgated by the State, does not allege a conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1985(3). Furthermore, because the Foundation is not answerable for the State's actions, application of the "relation back" doctrine under CPLR 205, for the purpose of overcoming the statute of limitations, is precluded (see Kitson v. Atl. Refining Mktg. Corp., 227 A.D.2d 971).

The federal claims asserted against the State could have been raised in the prior federal litigation and are thus barred on the ground of res judicata (see O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 357-358). In addition, inasmuch as the distinction plaintiffs would make between their present "unjust taking" claim and the previously litigated Boren Amendment claims is untenable, the subject claims were also properly dismissed on the ground of collateral estoppel (see Pinnacle Consultants, Ltd. v. Leucadia Natl. Corp., 94 N.Y.2d 426, 431-432).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Concourse Rehab. Nsg. Ctr. v. Novello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 2003
309 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Concourse Rehab. Nsg. Ctr. v. Novello

Case Details

Full title:CONCOURSE REHABILITATION NURSING CENTER, INC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 9, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 341