From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Concord Shopping Center v. Bookbinder

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 12, 1969
227 So. 2d 888 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 69-189.

November 12, 1969.

Appeal from the Civil Court of Record, Dade County, John R. Blanton, J.

Edward Brigham, for appellant.

Melvin I. Muroff, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C.J., and BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.


The principal point on this appeal urges that the trial court erred in denying defendant-appellant's motion for a new trial. The only ground for new trial argued is that an altercation which occurred outside the courtroom may have influenced the jury verdict. See Owens v. State, 68 Fla. 154, 67 So. 39 (1914).

A review of the record demonstrates that the trial judge made full inquiry of the jury prior to their discharge. From the replies of the jurors it is clear that no prejudice to the appellant resulted. Cf. First Nat. Bank in Tarpon Springs v. Bliss, Fla. 1952, 56 So.2d 922.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Concord Shopping Center v. Bookbinder

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 12, 1969
227 So. 2d 888 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

Concord Shopping Center v. Bookbinder

Case Details

Full title:CONCORD SHOPPING CENTER, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 12, 1969

Citations

227 So. 2d 888 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Citing Cases

South by South v. Palm Bay Club, Inc.

m Bay Club, Inc. for negligence. The judgment from which the plaintiffs appeal is affirmed upon a holding…

Rudolph v. Gleason

The contention that prejudice to the appellants resulted therefrom is pure speculation and we find that the…