From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Concord General Mut. Ins. v. Estate of Lawton

Supreme Court of Vermont
Jan 31, 2003
820 A.2d 196 (Vt. 2003)

Opinion

No. 01-239, January Term, 2002

January 31, 2003

APPEALED FROM: Franklin Superior Court, DOCKET NO. S 140-00FC, Trial Judge: Ben W. Joseph.


¶ 1. In light of this Court's recent decision in Colwell v. Allstate Insurance Co., 2003 VT 5, which controls the outcome of this dispute, we reverse the superior court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Michael Lawton, and order that summary judgment be entered for plaintiff, Concord General Mutual Insurance Company. In Colwell, this Court determined that 23 V.S.A. § 941(f) entitles an injured insured to underinsured motorist coverage (UIM) only when the total limits of liability laid out in the tortfeasor's policy are less than the uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage stated in the insured's policy, not when the injured insured's awarded share is less than his UIM coverage. Id. Here, the tortfeasor's liability coverage exceeded the UIM coverage provided to the injured insured by plaintiff. As such, he did not fall into the statutory definition of underinsured. Despite the fact that defendant actually recovered less than the limit of UIM coverage provided by plaintiff, he is not entitled to UIM benefits.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Concord General Mut. Ins. v. Estate of Lawton

Supreme Court of Vermont
Jan 31, 2003
820 A.2d 196 (Vt. 2003)
Case details for

Concord General Mut. Ins. v. Estate of Lawton

Case Details

Full title:Concord General Mutual Insurance Company v. Estate of Michael S. Lawton

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont

Date published: Jan 31, 2003

Citations

820 A.2d 196 (Vt. 2003)
175 Vt. 475
2003 Vt. 7

Citing Cases

McGoff v. Acadia Insurance Company

In the spring of 2007, he also made the instant claim for additional UIM coverage against Acadia. Acadia…