From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Concert v. Luzerne Bor. Admin. Offices

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 3, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-2333 (M.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-CV-2333

05-03-2012

THOMAS CONCERT Plaintiff, v. LUZERNE BOROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES, ET AL, Defendants


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


(MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARLSON)


ORDER

NOW this 3day of May 2012, upon review of Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) is ADOPTED.
(2) Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is GRANTED.
(3) Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
(4) The Clerk of Court is ordered to mark this matter as CLOSED.

_________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Concert v. Luzerne Bor. Admin. Offices

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 3, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-2333 (M.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Concert v. Luzerne Bor. Admin. Offices

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS CONCERT Plaintiff, v. LUZERNE BOROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES, ET…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 3, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-CV-2333 (M.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)