Concepcion v. Kinch

Full title: JORGE L. CONCEPCION, Plaintiff, v. KIRSTEN KINCH, BRANDY BECK, JOHN E…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 19, 2022

Civil Action 21-CV-3434 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-CV-3434

12-19-2022

JORGE L. CONCEPCION, Plaintiff, v. KIRSTEN KINCH, BRANDY BECK, JOHN E. DILLENSNYDER III, TONYA SHAFFER, AND JOHN DOE, Defendants.

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, J.

ORDER

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, J.

AND NOW, this 16^th day of December, 2022, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 42 & 44), as well as all other submissions related thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 42 & 44) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part,

2. Counts I, II, and III of Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (ECF 41) are DISMISSED without prejudice with leave to amend within fourteen (14) days,

3. Count IV is DISMISSED with prejudice against Defendants Shaffer and Dillensnyder only,

4. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are DENIED (ECF Nos. 42 & 44) as to Count

IV against Defendants Kinch, Beck, and Doe.