From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Concepcion Garcia-Menocal v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 23, 1990
157 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

January 23, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.).


In this personal injury action involving a pedestrian's sidewalk fall, the notice filed pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e admittedly described the accident site as in front of 225 Seventh Avenue, Manhattan, although the accident actually occurred at 362 Seventh Avenue, approximately seven blocks away. The complaint served by the plaintiffs was similarly erroneous. The defendant city was undoubtedly prejudiced by the mistake. It made a thorough investigation of the 225 location within several weeks of being given the notice. The IAS court was correct in denying amendment of the notice of claim. By the time the city learned, over two years later, of the actual location of the accident, it could no longer conduct a proper investigation. (See, Alvarez v. City of New York, 155 A.D.2d 373.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Carro and Rosenberger, JJ.


Summaries of

Concepcion Garcia-Menocal v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 23, 1990
157 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Concepcion Garcia-Menocal v. City of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:CONCEPCION GARCIA-MENOCAL et al, Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1990

Citations

157 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
550 N.Y.S.2d 302

Citing Cases

O'Keefe v. City of New York

The IAS court correctly found that the notice of claim was impermissibly vague in that it did not indicate…