From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conboy v. Ayres

Supreme Court, Kings Special Term
Oct 1, 1898
25 Misc. 52 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1898)

Opinion

October, 1898.

Hugo Hirsh for motion.

G.S. Carpenter opposed.


An order to prosecute in forma pauperis cannot be obtained ex parte after the action is begun (1 Paige, 39; 6 Hill, 257; 14 How. Pr., 16). It might be inferred from the report of the decision in Shearman v. Pope ( 106 N.Y. 664) that the order was obtained on notice, but reference to the record shows that not to have been so. The court either overlooked this, or else the ex parte order was deemed valid until vacated.

Let the ex parte order be vacated, and the time to give security be postponed for ten days.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Conboy v. Ayres

Supreme Court, Kings Special Term
Oct 1, 1898
25 Misc. 52 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1898)
Case details for

Conboy v. Ayres

Case Details

Full title:MARY CONBOY, by Guardian, Plaintiff, v . PHILIP AYRES, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, Kings Special Term

Date published: Oct 1, 1898

Citations

25 Misc. 52 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1898)
53 N.Y.S. 1004

Citing Cases

Rosetano v. State of New York

Furthermore, while an application for leave to sue as a poor person may be made ex parte if made before…