From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comstock v. Wash. Child Protective Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Feb 10, 2020
CASE NO. C19-5537 BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 10, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. C19-5537 BHS

02-10-2020

DEANNA COMSTOCK, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge, Dkt. 13, and Plaintiff Deanna Comstock's ("Comstock") objections to the R&R, Dkt. 14.

On November 11, 2019, Judge Creatura issued the R&R recommending that the Court dismiss Comstock's second amended complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Dkt. 13. Om December 6, 2019, Comstock filed another proposed amended complaint and objections. Dkt. 14.

The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

In this case, the Court agrees with Judge Creatura that Comstock has failed to state a claim after the Court has afforded her multiple opportunities. Comstock fails to properly assert jurisdiction or identify the actors that allegedly violated her rights. Instead, Comstock asserts general allegations that the State illegally took her children. It remains unclear when this happened, who took her children, and whether she has exhausted her available state court remedies. Therefore, the Court having considered the R&R, Plaintiff's objections, and the remaining record, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED;

(2) Comstock's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED;

(3) Comstock's complaint is DISMISSED; and

(4) The Clerk shall enter a JUDGMENT and close the case.

Dated this 10th day of February, 2020.

/s/_________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Comstock v. Wash. Child Protective Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Feb 10, 2020
CASE NO. C19-5537 BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Comstock v. Wash. Child Protective Servs.

Case Details

Full title:DEANNA COMSTOCK, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON CHILD PROTECTIVE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Feb 10, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. C19-5537 BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 10, 2020)