From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comstock v. Lawler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 21, 2011
NO. 10-3274 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 21, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 10-3274

12-21-2011

BRANDON COMSTOCK, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND LAWLER, et al., Respondents.


CIVIL ACTION


ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of December 2011, upon consideration of the Petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Petitioner's Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 14), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (Doc. No. 19), and the letter from the Office of the District Attorney of Northampton County dated December 21, 2011, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is UNCONDITIONALLY GRANTED.

3. All outstanding motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

4. The Clerk's Office shall close this case.

BY THE COURT:

________________

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.


Summaries of

Comstock v. Lawler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 21, 2011
NO. 10-3274 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Comstock v. Lawler

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON COMSTOCK, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND LAWLER, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 21, 2011

Citations

NO. 10-3274 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 21, 2011)