From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comstock v. Humphries

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 4, 2010
3:10-cv-00147-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. May. 4, 2010)

Opinion

3:10-cv-00147-LRH-RAM.

May 4, 2010


ORDER


This habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the Court on petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel that was submitted with the pleadings, which is considered in connection with initial review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The filing fee has been paid.

The Court will appoint counsel out of an abundance of caution, in light of the potential complexity of the procedural and merits issues that may be presented, the presence of a potentially substantial claim or claims, the lengthy 10 to 25 year habitual criminal sentence (starting in late 2003) as compared with petitioner's approximate current age of 50, and the possibility that time remains in the federal one-year limitation period.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the petition.

IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the motion for appointment of counsel accompanying the petition, that the motion is GRANTED, and that the Clerk shall show on the docket sheet that the motion is granted by this order. The counsel appointed will represent petitioner in all federal proceedings related to this matter, including any appeals or certiorari proceedings, unless allowed to withdraw.

IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that, taking into account the possible time remaining in the federal limitation period, the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada shall have fifteen (15) days to undertake direct representation of petitioner or to indicate to the Court her office's inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings. If the Federal Public Defender is unable to represent petitioner, the Court then shall appoint alternate counsel. A deadline for the filing of an amended petition will be set after counsel has filed a notice of appearance, in the order confirming the specific appointment. The Court anticipates setting the deadline, subject to request for extension, for July 15, 2010, taking into account the possible time remaining in the limitation period, absent tolling.

IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall add Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto as counsel for respondents and shall make informal electronic service of this order upon respondents by directing a notice of electronic filing to her office. Respondents' counsel shall enter a notice of appearance herein within ten (10) days of entry of this order, but no further response shall be required from respondents until further order of the Court.

The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order to the pro se petitioner, the Attorney General (in the manner described above), the Federal Public Defender, and the CJA Coordinator for this Division.

DATED this 4th day of May, 2010.


Summaries of

Comstock v. Humphries

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 4, 2010
3:10-cv-00147-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. May. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Comstock v. Humphries

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN D. COMSTOCK, Petitioner, v. STEFANIE HUMPHRIES, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 4, 2010

Citations

3:10-cv-00147-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. May. 4, 2010)