From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Computerized Med. v. Diasonics Ultrasound

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 27, 2000.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — Dismiss Pleading.

PRESENT: WISNER, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER AND KEHOE, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Defendant failed to establish that the parties agreed to arbitrate their dispute, and thus Supreme Court did not err in dismissing the fourth affirmative defense asserting that the parties must arbitrate their dispute. That affirmative defense was based on an arbitration agreement that had expired before the dispute arose, and defendant failed to establish that the parties had agreed to extend that arbitration agreement ( see, Matter of Waldron [Goddess], 61 N.Y.2d 181, 185-186; see also, Matter of Express Indus. Term. Corp. v. New York State Dept. of Transp., 93 N.Y.2d 584, 589, rearg denied 93 N.Y.2d 1042).


Summaries of

Computerized Med. v. Diasonics Ultrasound

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Computerized Med. v. Diasonics Ultrasound

Case Details

Full title:COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING EQUIPMENT, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 686

Citing Cases

Computerized Med. v. Diasonics Ultrasound

The court otherwise properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the remainder of…