From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Computerized Med. v. Diasonics Ultrasound

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2003
303 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 02-01799

March 21, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Mintz, J.), entered April 12, 2002, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff's motion to renew.

PHILLIPS, LYTLE, HITCHCOCK, BLAINE HUBER LLP, BUFFALO (DAVID J. McNAMARA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (TIMOTHY J. PERRY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., PINE, HURLBUTT, AND LAWTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Computerized Med. Imaging Equip. v. Diasonics Ultrasound ([appeal No. 1] 303 A.D.2d 962 [Mar. 21, 2003]).


Summaries of

Computerized Med. v. Diasonics Ultrasound

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2003
303 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Computerized Med. v. Diasonics Ultrasound

Case Details

Full title:COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING EQUIPMENT, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 910