From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Composto v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 12, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-cv-02423-CMA-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-02423-CMA-BNB.

February 12, 2009


ORDER


This matter arises on the plaintiff's Motion to Strike State Farm's Designation of Plaintiff's Employer as Alleged At Fault Nonparty [Doc. # 13, filed 1/23/2009] (the "Motion to Strike"). I held a hearing on the Motion to Strike and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Strike is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature. The plaintiff may reassert the issue at an appropriate time after the nature of the claims, injuries, defenses, and bases for the nonparty at fault designation have been fully developed through discovery.


Summaries of

Composto v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 12, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-cv-02423-CMA-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Composto v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:PENNY COMPOSTO, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 12, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-02423-CMA-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 2009)