Compagnone v. MJ Licensing Co.

1 Citing case

  1. Ding v. The Mask Pot

    20-CV-06076 (LDH) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2022)   Cited 5 times

    Indeed, in each of Plaintiff's cases where the claims against individual defendants survived a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the complaint alleged the individual had control over the plaintiffs' pay. See Compagnone v. MJ Licensing Co., No. 18-cv-6227, 2019 WL 1953931, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. May 2, 2019) (plaintiff alleged that he spoke with defendants regarding his salary); Li v. Leung, No. 15-cv-5265, 2016 WL 5369489, at *10 (E.D.N.Y. June 10, 2016) (plaintiff alleged that individual defendant determined rate of pay); Ramirez v. Riverbay Corp., 35 F.Supp. 513, 521 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (plaintiff alleged individual defendant was responsible for processing payroll and set rates of pay); Chan v. Triple 8 Place, No. 3-cv-6048, 2004 WL 1161299, at **1-2 (S.D.N.Y. May 24, 2004) (plaintiff's complaint included the conclusory allegation that individual defendants determined pay).