From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comm'rs of the State Ins. Fund v. Titanium Interiors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 20, 2020
180 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

11084 Index 403442/10

02-20-2020

COMMISSIONERS OF the STATE INSURANCE FUND, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. TITANIUM INTERIORS, INC., Defendant–Respondent.

Peter Cusick, New York (Isaac N. Guy Okafor of counsel), for appellant. Lugara PLLC, Brooklyn (Lorenzo Lugara of counsel), for respondent.


Peter Cusick, New York (Isaac N. Guy Okafor of counsel), for appellant.

Lugara PLLC, Brooklyn (Lorenzo Lugara of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alan C. Marin, J.), entered January 30, 2019, which, to the extent appealed from, denied in part plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its claim for unpaid workers' compensation premiums with interest to run from the date the policy was canceled, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted in its entirety.

Plaintiff's business records, which include the insurance application, audit worksheets, and resulting invoices and statement of accounts for a balance due, establish prima facie that it is entitled to judgment in the full amount that it sought (see e.g. Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Allou Distribs., 220 A.D.2d 217, 632 N.Y.S.2d 5 [1st Dept. 1995] ). In opposition, defendant failed to raise an issue of fact. Defendant claims that plaintiff incorrectly included already insured subcontractors in its premium calculations, but it failed to submit evidence supporting the claim, such as certificates of insurance for those subcontractors claimed to have obtained coverage otherwise (see Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Yesmont & Assoc., 226 A.D.2d 147, 148, 640 N.Y.S.2d 86 [1st Dept. 1996] ). Statutory interest should be calculated from the date of the cancellation of the policy (see Workers' Compensation Law § 93[a] ; see also CPLR 5004 ).


Summaries of

Comm'rs of the State Ins. Fund v. Titanium Interiors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 20, 2020
180 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Comm'rs of the State Ins. Fund v. Titanium Interiors, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund, Plaintiff-Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 20, 2020

Citations

180 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
180 A.D.3d 563
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 1259

Citing Cases

St. Ins. Fund v. Call-A-Head Corp.

which denied the motion of plaintiff Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund (SIF) for summary judgment…

Comm'rs of the State Ins. Fund v. Call-A-Head Corp.

SIF established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment through submission of its business records,…