Opinion
December 14, 1967.
March 20, 1968.
Criminal Law — Aggravated robbery — Evidence — Sufficiency — Cross-examination — Nature of appellate representation of defendant.
Commonwealth v. McMillan, 212 Pa. Super. 48, followed.
Before ERVIN, P.J., WRIGHT, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, and SPAULDING, JJ.
Appeal, No. 1141, Oct. T., 1967, from judgment of Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County, May T., 1967, No. 1231, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Norris Woodley. Judgment affirmed.
Indictment charging defendant with aggravated robbery, assault and battery, and conspiracy. Before MEADE, J.
Verdict of guilty as to charges of aggravated robbery and assault and battery and judgment of sentence entered thereon. Defendant appealed.
Melvin Dildine, Assistant Defender, and Herman I. Pollock, Defender, for appellant.
Victor J. DiNubile and Alan J. Davis, Assistant District Attorneys, Richard A. Sprague, First Assistant District Attorney, and Arlen Specter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
Submitted December 14, 1967.
This appeal is a companion to that in Commonwealth v. McMillan, 212 Pa. Super. 48, 240 A.2d 380, and is governed by our opinion in the McMillan case.
Judgment affirmed.