Opinion
11-P-1109
03-28-2012
COMMONWEALTH v. DEBORAH A. WITHERS.
NOTICE: Decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to its rule 1:28 are primarily addressed to the parties and, therefore, may not fully address the facts of the case or the panel's decisional rationale. Moreover, rule 1:28 decisions are not circulated to the entire court and, therefore, represent only the views of the panel that decided the case. A summary decision pursuant to rule 1:28, issued after February 25, 2008, may be cited for its persuasive value but, because of the limitations noted above, not as binding precedent.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28
The defendant, Deborah A. Withers, appeals from a jury verdict of guilty of negligent operation of a motor vehicle, on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient. Review of the evidence, in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, establishes that a rational trier of fact could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, all of the elements of negligent operation of a motor vehicle.
Judgment affirmed.
By the Court (Cypher, Green & Trainor, JJ.),