From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Ward

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 6, 2021
No. 14 MM 2021 (Pa. Apr. 6, 2021)

Opinion

No. 14 MM 2021

04-06-2021

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DANIEL KHALIL CLARY PETITION OF: ALEXANDER WARD, ESQ.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2021, in consideration of the Application for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County.

An attorney's appointment in a criminal matter continues on direct appeal through the allocatur stage, and an attorney may cease representation only upon leave of court. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 122, Comment (explaining that "counsel retains his or her appointment until final judgment, which includes all avenues of appeal through the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania"); Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(B)(1) (indicating that counsel for a criminal defendant may not withdraw absent leave of court).

If the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County allows Attorney Alexander Ward to withdraw, the court shall then consider whether to appoint new counsel or to permit Daniel Khalil Clary to proceed pro se. See Commonwealth v. Grazier, 713 A.2d 81 (Pa. 1998) (explaining that an on-the-record determination must be made as to whether a criminal defendant's request to proceed pro se is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary).

The Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County is ORDERED to enter its order regarding this remand within 90 days and to notify this Court promptly of its decision.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Ward

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 6, 2021
No. 14 MM 2021 (Pa. Apr. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DANIEL KHALIL CLARY PETITION OF: ALEXANDER…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 6, 2021

Citations

No. 14 MM 2021 (Pa. Apr. 6, 2021)