In Wadsworth, we expressly rejected the notion that an appellant, whose PCRA petition was untimely and did not satisfy any time-bar exception, would be entitled to vacate an illegal sentence pursuant to McIntyre.
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. PollardNo. 525 WDA 2020
02-08-2021
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Shawn Mitchell WADSWORTH, Appellant
Affirmed.
In Wadsworth, we expressly rejected the notion that an appellant, whose PCRA petition was untimely and did not satisfy any time-bar exception, would be entitled to vacate an illegal sentence pursuant to McIntyre.
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. PollardFull title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SHAWN MITCHELL WADSWORTH Appellant
Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Date published: Feb 8, 2021
In 2006, state prisoner Shawn Mitchell Wadsworth pled guilty to indecent assault, was determined to be a…
Commonwealth v. PollardTo the extent McIntyre clarifies that a conviction for failing to register under Megan's Law III cannot stand…