From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Vinton

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 12, 2010
937 N.E.2d 12 (Mass. 2010)

Opinion

November 12, 2010.

Moot Question.

Robert D. Moriarty, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

Beth L Eisenberg Ryan M. Schiff, Committee for Public Counsel Services, Nancy M. McLean for the juvenile.


Rescript Opinions.

The juvenile appealed from the denial in the Juvenile Court of his motion to vacate a condition of probation, specifically the requirement that he be subject to global positioning system (GPS) monitoring. We granted the juvenile's application for direct appellate review. We now dismiss the appeal as moot.

After the juvenile filed his appeal, a judge in the Juvenile Court allowed his motion to terminate his probation early. This relieved the juvenile of the GPS monitoring requirement. The issues raised in his appeal are therefore moot. The issues are likely to recur but are not apt to evade review. Particularly where they are constitutional in nature, we decline to decide them in a moot case. See Lockhart v. Attorney Gen., 390 Mass. 780, 783-784 (1984).

Appeal dismissed.

The case was submitted on briefs.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Vinton

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 12, 2010
937 N.E.2d 12 (Mass. 2010)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Vinton

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH v. VINTON V., a juvenile

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Nov 12, 2010

Citations

937 N.E.2d 12 (Mass. 2010)
458 Mass. 1017