Summary
holding in the PCRA context that "trial counsel did not require the defendant's consent in order to seek continuances in this case" and that "[s]ince the defense postponements constituted excludable time under Rule 600, there was no speedy trial violation" (cleaned up)
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. JonesOpinion
No. 256 WDA 2021
11-30-2021
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Antron TALLEY, Appellant
Non-Precedential Decision
See Pa. Superior Court Internal operating Procedures, § 65.37 before citing
Affirmed. Jurisdiction relinquished.