From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Talley

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 9, 2021
250 A.3d 468 (Pa. 2021)

Opinion

No. 541 MAL 2020

03-09-2021

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Daniel TALLEY, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9 th day of March, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED . The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Is the Commonwealth required under Art. I, [S]ection 14 of the Pennsylvania Constitution to produce clear and convincing evidence at a bail revocation hearing in order to meet its burden of proof that there is "no condition or combination of conditions other than imprisonment that will reasonably assure the safety of any person and the community when the proof is evident or presumption great"?

(2) Is it a violation of the Best Evidence Rule to permit the introduction of screenshots of text messages, and supporting testimony thereto, when those screenshots omit portions of the messages, all hyperlinks, and all metadata, and the original was in the possession of the offering party but has never been produced to the non-offering party?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Talley

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 9, 2021
250 A.3d 468 (Pa. 2021)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Talley

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. DANIEL TALLEY, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 9, 2021

Citations

250 A.3d 468 (Pa. 2021)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Talley

(2) Is it a violation of the Best Evidence Rule to permit the introduction of screenshots of text messages,…