From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Stovall

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Feb 15, 2017
166 A.3d 1227 (Pa. 2017)

Summary

denying petition for allowance of appeal from Pennsylvania Superior Court decision affirming judgment of sentence, after trial court refused to grant defendant's counsel's noncompliant pro hac vice application, but instead allowed counsel to participate in defense at trial in an advisory capacity

Summary of this case from Cnty. of Fulton v. Sec'y of the Commonwealth

Opinion

No. 220 WAL 2016

02-15-2017

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Daniel L. STOVALL, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. The Application to Remand for a Grazier Hearing, the Application for Permission to File an Amended Petition for Allowance of Appeal, and the Application for Release on Bail are DENIED.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Stovall

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Feb 15, 2017
166 A.3d 1227 (Pa. 2017)

denying petition for allowance of appeal from Pennsylvania Superior Court decision affirming judgment of sentence, after trial court refused to grant defendant's counsel's noncompliant pro hac vice application, but instead allowed counsel to participate in defense at trial in an advisory capacity

Summary of this case from Cnty. of Fulton v. Sec'y of the Commonwealth
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Stovall

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. DANIEL L. STOVALL, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 15, 2017

Citations

166 A.3d 1227 (Pa. 2017)

Citing Cases

Cnty. of Fulton v. Sec'y of the Commonwealth

Finally, the Master notes that this approach is not without historical precedent in the Courts of the…