From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Sitko

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
May 31, 1963
190 N.E.2d 902 (Mass. 1963)

Opinion

May 31, 1963.

James C. Donnelly, Jr., for the defendant.

John F. Driscoll, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.


Exceptions overruled. The defendant pleaded guilty on June 8, 1961, to each of a series of indictments charging him with a variety of crimes, and sentences were imposed. The defendant moved on June 26, 1961, for leave to withdraw his pleas of guilty on the ground that he had new evidence available to substantiate his contention of innocence to all the charges. After hearing, his motion was denied and the defendant excepted to the denial. Under G.L.c. 278, § 29, as amended through St. 1957, c. 302, the denial of the motion was discretionary. See Commonwealth v. Wakelin, 230 Mass. 567, 570; Commonwealth v. Marino, 254 Mass. 533, 535. There was no abuse of discretion.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Sitko

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
May 31, 1963
190 N.E.2d 902 (Mass. 1963)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Sitko

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH vs. EDWARD SITKO

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: May 31, 1963

Citations

190 N.E.2d 902 (Mass. 1963)
346 Mass. 765

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Crowell

The denial of the motion rested in the discretion of the judge. Commonwealth v. Sitko, 346 Mass. 765, and…