From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Sanabria

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 6, 2020
236 A.3d 1080 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

Summary

finding PCRA court did not err in dismissing request for additional time to respond to Rule 907 notice

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Canady

Opinion

No. 588 EDA 2019

04-06-2020

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Lee SANABRIA, Appellant


Non-Precedential Decision See Pa. Superior Court Internal operating Procedures, § 65.37 before citing

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Sanabria

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 6, 2020
236 A.3d 1080 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

finding PCRA court did not err in dismissing request for additional time to respond to Rule 907 notice

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Canady
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Sanabria

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LEE SANABRIA, Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 6, 2020

Citations

236 A.3d 1080 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Canady

We find the PCRA court did not err or abuse its discretion in denying appellant additional time to respond to…