From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Sachette

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 4, 2016
143 A.3d 890 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 973 MAL 2015.

08-04-2016

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Carl William SACHETTE, Petitioner.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of August 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Assuming arguendo the trial record supports the verdict for unlawful contact with a minor, is the 25 to 50 year sentence otherwise unconstitutional?

This matter is consolidated with Commonwealth v. Bragg, 67 EAL 2016 and Commonwealth v. Macklin, 288 MAL 2015 for oral argument.

Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Sachette

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 4, 2016
143 A.3d 890 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Sachette

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. CARL WILLIAM SACHETTE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 4, 2016

Citations

143 A.3d 890 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Tooks

" Our Supreme Court consolidated this matter with two other cases, Commonwealth v. Macklin, 143 A.3d 890 (Pa.…

Commonwealth v. Diaz

We note the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has granted allowance of appeal on this issue in three consolidated…