From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Royce

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Apr 20, 1978
6 Mass. App. Ct. 870 (Mass. App. Ct. 1978)

Opinion

April 20, 1978.

Albert L. Hutton, Jr., for the defendant.

Robert W. Banks, Assistant District Attorney ( Charles J. Hely, Assistant District Attorney, with him) for the Commonwealth.


The judge found that the defendant did not give or send his application for a speedy trial under G.L.c. 277, § 72A, to the Commissioner or any other member of the Department of Correction but instead mailed it to the clerk of the courts, where it was docketed and then lay dormant for more than six months. The district attorney was not informed of the application. In these circumstances there was no error in denying the defendant's subsequent motion to dismiss the instant indictments. The statute charges the Commissioner with responsibility for notifying the appropriate district attorney of the pendency of the application and contemplates that the district attorney will undertake responsibility for speedy disposition of the case in accordance with the requirements of § 72A. This case is distinguished from Commonwealth v. Boyd, 367 Mass. 169, 177-179 (1975), and Commonwealth v. Alexander, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 212 (1976), S.C. 371 Mass. 726 (1977), in each of which the district attorney received prompt notice of the filing of the defendant's demand.

Judgments affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Royce

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Apr 20, 1978
6 Mass. App. Ct. 870 (Mass. App. Ct. 1978)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Royce

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH vs. WILLIAM ROYCE

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Apr 20, 1978

Citations

6 Mass. App. Ct. 870 (Mass. App. Ct. 1978)
374 N.E.2d 1236

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Royce

We conclude that the motion to dismiss was properly denied and, accordingly, affirm the judgments of…