From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Ricker

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 18, 2016
635 Pa. 255 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 588 MAL 2015

2016-04-18

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. David Edward RICKER, Petitioner.


135 A.3d 175

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court wrongly held, in a published opinion of first impression, that a defendant does not have a state or federal constitutional right to confront the witness against him at a preliminary hearing and that a prima fade case may be proven by the Commonwealth through hearsay evidence alone, which is what the trial and magisterial district courts concluded in Petitioner’s case?

Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Ricker

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 18, 2016
635 Pa. 255 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Ricker

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. DAVID EDWARD RICKER, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 18, 2016

Citations

635 Pa. 255 (Pa. 2016)
135 A.3d 175

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Harris

This Court in recent years has sought to clarify when the Commonwealth may properly use hearsay evidence to…

Commonwealth v. Russell

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania granted Ricker's petition for allowance of appeal on April 18, 2016. See…