From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Reid

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Oct 15, 2020
J-16-2019 (Pa. Oct. 15, 2020)

Opinion

J-16-2019 No. 748 CAP

10-15-2020

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. ANTHONY REID, Appellant


Appeal from the Order entered on November 16, 2007 in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Criminal Division, denying PCRA relief at No. CP-51-CR-0602521-1989. (Nunc Pro Tunc appeal rights reinstated on June 22, 2017) CONCURRING STATEMENT JUSTICE DONOHUE

I join the order as I am constrained to do as a result of this Court's precedential opinion in Commonwealth v. Reid, 235 A.3d 1124 (Pa. 2020). For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Reid, I continue to hold the view that Williams v. Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S.Ct. 1899 (2016), mandates that this defendant receive a de novo appeal to this Court because former Justice Castille, while the District Attorney of Philadelphia, authorized the pursuit of the death penalty in his case and later participated in the appeal of the imposition of that sentence. Williams should have been retroactively applied to this defendant and the two other defendants similarly situated. I continue to believe that the preservation of the integrity of this Court demanded no less.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Reid

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Oct 15, 2020
J-16-2019 (Pa. Oct. 15, 2020)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Reid

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. ANTHONY REID, Appellant

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Oct 15, 2020

Citations

J-16-2019 (Pa. Oct. 15, 2020)