From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Ramsey

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 24, 2014
105 A.3d 800 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014)

Summary

affirming conviction based on serum blood test where the lab technician testified she used conversion factors of 1.35 (low equivalent) and 1.10 (high equivalent)

Summary of this case from Boslet v. Richmond

Opinion

NO. 1461 MDA 2013

2014-07-24

Com. v. B. Ramsey




Appeal From: CP–28–CR–0001540–2011 (Franklin)

Disposition: Affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Ramsey

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 24, 2014
105 A.3d 800 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014)

affirming conviction based on serum blood test where the lab technician testified she used conversion factors of 1.35 (low equivalent) and 1.10 (high equivalent)

Summary of this case from Boslet v. Richmond
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Ramsey

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. BRANDON MICHAEL RAMSEY Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 24, 2014

Citations

105 A.3d 800 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014)

Citing Cases

Boslet v. Richmond

Those cases have continued to recognize that '"[t]he general rule for alcohol related DUIs is that only tests…