Opinion
NO. 1154 WDA 2013
2014-09-12
Com. v. D. Nixon
Appeal From: CP–02–CR–0001502–2012 (Allegheny)
Disposition: Affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Commonwealth v. Nixon
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 12, 2014
107 A.3d 225 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014)
Summaries of
Commonwealth v. Nixon
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 12, 2014
107 A.3d 225 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014)
Case details for
Commonwealth v. Nixon
Case Details
Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. DANNY LEE NIXON Appellant
Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Date published: Sep 12, 2014
Citations
107 A.3d 225 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014)
Citing Cases
Commonwealth v. Schestok
Jurisdiction of the court may be proven by circumstantial evidence. Commonwealth v. Passmore, 857 A.2d 697…
Roberts v. VaranoHowever, it is well settled that "[a]ll Courts of Common Pleas have original jurisdiction over criminal…