From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Myers

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Feb 3, 2016
131 A.3d 480 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 517 EAL 2015.

02-03-2016

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Darrell MYERS, Respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in holding, in a published decision, that a warrant was required to obtain blood for a chemical test where the officer had probable cause to believe that the [Respondent] was driving under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance, and [Respondent] did not affirmatively refuse consent?

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Myers

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Feb 3, 2016
131 A.3d 480 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Myers

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. DARRELL MYERS, Respondent

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 3, 2016

Citations

131 A.3d 480 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Myers

Justice Mundy files a dissenting opinion. Commonwealth v. Myers, 131 A.3d 480 (Pa. 2016) (per curiam).…