From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Murray

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 15, 2017
2017 Pa. Super. 363 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017)

Opinion

J-S02034-17 No. 3010 EDA 2015

11-15-2017

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. ABDUL MURRAY Appellant


Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered April 30, 2015
In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
Criminal Division at No: CP-51-CR-0001435-2013 BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., STABILE, and MOULTON, JJ. CONCURRING OPINION BY STABILE, J.:

I write briefly to emphasize that the record contains case-specific facts supporting Agent Todd Clark's search of Appellant's cell phone. Specifically, Appellant admitted to Agent Clark that he handled a firearm and passed it on to an acquaintance. Agent Todd believed, based on his prior experience, that Appellant's cell phone could reveal communications referencing the firearm. Majority Opinion, at 13. I believe Appellant's statement to Agent Clark, combined with Agent Clark's prior experience, was sufficient to create reasonable suspicion in support of a search of Appellant's cell phone. We are not faced here with a bald assertion, based on an agent's experience, that cell phones often contain relevant evidence. Subject to this observation, I join the Majority's well-reasoned opinion.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Murray

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 15, 2017
2017 Pa. Super. 363 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. ABDUL MURRAY Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 15, 2017

Citations

2017 Pa. Super. 363 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017)