From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Moody

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Nov 7, 2013
No. 407 EAL 2012 (Pa. Nov. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 407 EAL 2012 No. 408 EAL 2012 No. 409 EAL 2012

11-07-2013

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. KATRINA MOODY, Respondent COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. BARBARA IVERY, Respondent COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. BERNADETTE ARCHIE, Respondent


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2013, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. The issues accepted for appeal, as stated by Petitioner with slight modifications, are:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in ruling that Respondent's violent in-court conduct was not summary direct criminal contempt because the trial court supposedly did not observe the conduct?
(2) In cases of summary direct criminal contempt, is a defendant entitled to counsel and to call witnesses?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Moody

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Nov 7, 2013
No. 407 EAL 2012 (Pa. Nov. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Moody

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. KATRINA MOODY, Respondent…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Nov 7, 2013

Citations

No. 407 EAL 2012 (Pa. Nov. 7, 2013)