From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Mont

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 22, 2021
266 A.3d 646 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021)

Summary

In Mont, the appellant claimed the Sentencing Commission exceeded its authority by assigning a disproportionately higher OGS for the offense of possessing a gun with an altered manufacturer's number than that for the offense of altering or obliterating marks of identification.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Frisch

Opinion

No. 90 EDA 2021

10-22-2021

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Jaron MONT, Appellant



Non-Precedential Decision

See Pa. Superior Court Internal operating Procedures, § 65.37 before citing

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Mont

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 22, 2021
266 A.3d 646 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021)

In Mont, the appellant claimed the Sentencing Commission exceeded its authority by assigning a disproportionately higher OGS for the offense of possessing a gun with an altered manufacturer's number than that for the offense of altering or obliterating marks of identification.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Frisch
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Mont

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Jaron MONT, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Oct 22, 2021

Citations

266 A.3d 646 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Young

Regardless, we cannot consider the potential impact of this typographical error since Appellant has not…

Commonwealth v. Frisch

This Court recently considered a similar issue in Commonwealth v. Mont, 266 A.3d 646 (Pa.Super. filed…