From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Miley

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 23, 2017
No. 18 MM 2017 (Pa. Mar. 23, 2017)

Opinion

No. 18 MM 2017

03-23-2017

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. RAYMOND HARRY MILEY, Petitioner


ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2017, in consideration of the Motion to Proceed Pro Se and the Petition for Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County for that court to determine whether Petitioner's current counsel should be granted leave to withdraw. If current counsel is permitted to withdraw, the court shall then determine whether Petitioner should be granted leave to proceed pro se or new counsel should be appointed. The Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County is DIRECTED to enter its order regarding this remand within 45 days.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Miley

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 23, 2017
No. 18 MM 2017 (Pa. Mar. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Miley

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. RAYMOND HARRY MILEY, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 23, 2017

Citations

No. 18 MM 2017 (Pa. Mar. 23, 2017)