focusing on the defendant's “conduct,” noting that the defendant's actions caused “alarm” in one person and determining that her “implicit threat” combined with her “violently slamming a door” supported the conviction
Summary of this case from Nuon v. City of LowellNo. 06-P-155.
November 8, 2006.
Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28.
Judgment affirmed.
focusing on the defendant's “conduct,” noting that the defendant's actions caused “alarm” in one person and determining that her “implicit threat” combined with her “violently slamming a door” supported the conviction
Summary of this case from Nuon v. City of LowellFull title:COMMONWEALTH v. MARY HYATT
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Nov 8, 2006
Id. The Court affirmed his conviction, however, finding that the “noise and commotion [created by defendant]…