From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Macklin

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 4, 2016
143 A.3d 890 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 288 MAL 2015.

08-04-2016

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Darren Lamont MACKLIN, Petitioner.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of August 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Whether the government is required to include notice of its intent to seek a mandatory penalty under a recidivist statute within the charging document since such mandatory penalties equate to new, aggravated crimes?

This matter is consolidated with Commonwealth v. Bragg, 67 EAL 2016 and Commonwealth v. Sachette, 973 MAL 2015 for oral argument.

Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Macklin

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 4, 2016
143 A.3d 890 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Macklin

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. DARREN LAMONT MACKLIN…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 4, 2016

Citations

143 A.3d 890 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Tooks

We are aware that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has granted allowance of appeal in Commonwealth v. Bragg,…

Commonwealth v. Diaz

We note the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has granted allowance of appeal on this issue in three consolidated…