From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Loughnane

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jul 19, 2016
158 A.3d 1224 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 164 MAL 2016

07-19-2016

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Daniel F. LOUGHNANE, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues.

Whether the Superior Court erred by holding that the automobile exception, adopted in Commonwealth v. Gary, 91 A.3d 102 (Pa. 2014), allowed police to seize a vehicle from the defendant's private residential driveway without a warrant?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Loughnane

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jul 19, 2016
158 A.3d 1224 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Loughnane

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. DANIEL F. LOUGHNANE, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 19, 2016

Citations

158 A.3d 1224 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Loughnane

Challenging the ultimate holding of the Superior Court, Loughnane requested allowance of appeal, which we…

Commonwealth v. Loughnane

Our supreme court denied allocatur as to these issues. Commonwealth v. Loughnane, 158 A.3d 1224 (Pa. 2016).…