From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Lee

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 22, 2015
118 A.3d 451 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015)

Summary

treating "[t]he evidence of concealment" as mere "support" for the jury's finding of intent to steal

Summary of this case from Baghdad v. Attorney Gen.

Opinion

NO. 682 MDA 2014

01-22-2015

Com. v. S. Lee


Appeal From: CP–41–CR–0000760–2013 (Lycoming)

Disposition: Affirmed.


Pa.Super. 2015.
Com. v. Lee
118 A.3d 451 (Table)




• 2014 WL 8843219 (Appellate Brief) Brief for the Appellee (Nov. 10, 2014)
• 2014 WL 8094710 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Appellee (Oct. 8, 2014)
• 2014 WL 8094709 (Appellate Brief) Brief for Appellant and Appendix. (Sep. 15, 2014)
• 682 MDA 2014 (Docket) (Apr. 22, 2014)



Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Lee

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 22, 2015
118 A.3d 451 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015)

treating "[t]he evidence of concealment" as mere "support" for the jury's finding of intent to steal

Summary of this case from Baghdad v. Attorney Gen.
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. SHERRY ELAINE LEE, Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 22, 2015

Citations

118 A.3d 451 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015)

Citing Cases

Baghdad v. Attorney Gen.

The jury still must find that "the inference [of intent to steal] ... follow[s] beyond a reasonable doubt…