From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. King

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Apr 30, 2018
184 A.3d 946 (Pa. 2018)

Opinion

No. 457 EAL 2017

04-30-2018

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Jerome KING, Respondent


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as phrased by the Commonwealth, is:

Did the Superior Court commit a significant and potentially far-reaching error of law when, in contravention of Pennsylvania law and the greater weight of authority nationally, it issued a published decision holding that PCRA courts may bar the Commonwealth from speaking with [a defendant's] trial counsel prior to evidentiary hearings on defense claims that counsel provided ineffective assistance?

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. King

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Apr 30, 2018
184 A.3d 946 (Pa. 2018)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. King

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. JEROME KING, Respondent

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 30, 2018

Citations

184 A.3d 946 (Pa. 2018)