From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Karash

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 16, 2017
2017 Pa. Super. 365 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017)

Opinion

J-A18008-17 No. 263 WDA 2017

11-16-2017

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. FREDERICK W. KARASH Appellant


Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence January 24, 2017
In the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-25-SA-0000161-2016 BEFORE: BOWES, J., LAZARUS, J., and OTT, J. CONCURRING STATEMENT BY OTT, J.:

I am constrained to agree with the Majority that the decision in Banellis is controlling, and accordingly, we must reverse the appellant's judgment of sentence.

Nevertheless, I agree with the comment of the Williams Court that this interpretation of the statute will lead to an "absurd result." Williams , supra , 872 A.2d at 189. Indeed, I find it difficult to believe the legislature, when enacting this statute, intended to require the Commonwealth to prove a negative in every prosecution under this section.

Judge Lazarus joins the concurring statement.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Karash

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 16, 2017
2017 Pa. Super. 365 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Karash

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. FREDERICK W. KARASH Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 16, 2017

Citations

2017 Pa. Super. 365 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017)