From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Jordan

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Dec 29, 2020
241 A.3d 1092 (Pa. 2020)

Opinion

No. 269 WAL 2020

12-29-2020

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Gregory JORDAN, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:

Whether the Superior Court panel erred as a matter of law in concluding that inconsistent verdicts are always permissible in consolidated jury/bench trials pursuant to Commonwealth v. Yachymiak, 351 Pa.Super. 361, 505 A.2d 1024 (1986) and Commonwealth v. Wharton, 406 Pa.Super. 430, 594 A.2d 696 (1991), particularly where a different panel of the Superior Court reached the exact opposite conclusion in Commonwealth v. Rankin, [235 A.3d 373 (Pa. Super. 2020)]?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Jordan

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Dec 29, 2020
241 A.3d 1092 (Pa. 2020)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Jordan

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. GREGORY JORDAN, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Dec 29, 2020

Citations

241 A.3d 1092 (Pa. 2020)