From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Hopkins

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 24, 2016
133 A.3d 737 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 899 MAL 2015.

03-24-2016

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Lorne Brett HOPKINS, Jr., Respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether, under Pennsylvania law, a search warrant should be invalidated and the resulting evidence suppressed where an affiant truthfully and accurately recites statements made by a self-incriminating co-defendant in an affidavit of probable cause, but the falsity of the co-defendant's statements could not be discovered prior to the issuance of the search warrant?

Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Hopkins

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 24, 2016
133 A.3d 737 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Hopkins

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. LORNE BRETT HOPKINS, JR.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 24, 2016

Citations

133 A.3d 737 (Pa. 2016)