Opinion
No. 305 MDA 2014
11-16-2015
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of November 2015, this Court having determined that this case should be considered by the Court sitting en banc, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
THAT this case be listed before the next available en banc panel;
THAT the parties shall, in their respective briefs, provide argument on the following issue: Whether parents may be considered "victims" for purposes of determining restitution under 18 Pa.C.S. § 1106(a)? The parties shall comply without prejudice to raise other, pertinent issues in their respective briefs, including those raised in the original briefs.
THAT Appellant, Norma Jean Holmes, shall file an original and nineteen (19) copies of either the brief previously filed together with a supplemental brief addressing the issue above, or a substituted Brief for Appellant by December 3, 2015, along with an original and ten (10) copies of the reproduced record. Appellee, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, shall thereafter have twenty-one (21) days after service to file an original and nineteen (19) copies of either the brief previously filed together with a supplemental brief addressing the issue above, or a
substituted Brief for Appellee. Appellant shall thereafter have fourteen (14) days after service to file an original and nineteen (19) copies of a reply brief in accordance with Pa.R.A.P. 2113(a), if desired. No other briefs may be filed by the parties without leave of this Court.
PER CURIAM